|
|
| Nate Silver (1006188) | |
 |
|
| Home > OTChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
| (1006188) | |
Nate Silver |
|
|
Posted by DANd124 on Wed Nov 7 00:17:35 2012 as of now he has every state correct. |
|
|
| (1006205) | |
Re: Nate Silver |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Wed Nov 7 00:33:07 2012, in response to Nate Silver, posted by DANd124 on Wed Nov 7 00:17:35 2012. Yes, very impressive. And totally non-partisan. Done completely based on good use of statistics. You can lie with statistics but you can also make very good predictions if you use them properly. |
|
|
| (1006209) | |
Re: Nate Silver |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Nov 7 00:35:38 2012, in response to Nate Silver, posted by DANd124 on Wed Nov 7 00:17:35 2012. So you're saying he had inside information on a stolen election? Is that what you're saying? |
|
|
| (1006212) | |
Re: Nate Silver |
|
|
Posted by DANd124 on Wed Nov 7 00:37:24 2012, in response to Re: Nate Silver, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Nov 7 00:35:38 2012. because if someone was going to steal an election they'd sure want to make sure the media knew about it. |
|
|
| (1006213) | |
Re: Nate Silver |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Wed Nov 7 00:39:04 2012, in response to Re: Nate Silver, posted by DANd124 on Wed Nov 7 00:37:24 2012. Especially after the fact. |
|
|
| (1006219) | |
Re: Nate Silver |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Nov 7 00:43:47 2012, in response to Re: Nate Silver, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Nov 7 00:35:38 2012. 
|
|
|
| (1006233) | |
Re: Nate Silver is Golden |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Nov 7 00:52:29 2012, in response to Re: Nate Silver, posted by AlM on Wed Nov 7 00:33:07 2012. They still won't get how it works. |
|
|
| (1006246) | |
Re: Nate Silver |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Wed Nov 7 00:57:09 2012, in response to Nate Silver, posted by DANd124 on Wed Nov 7 00:17:35 2012. 
|
|
|
| (1006251) | |
Re: Nate Silver |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Nov 7 01:00:14 2012, in response to Re: Nate Silver, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Nov 7 00:57:09 2012.  Heh.
|
|
|
| (1006253) | |
Re: Nate Silver is Golden |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Wed Nov 7 01:00:33 2012, in response to Re: Nate Silver is Golden, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Nov 7 00:52:29 2012. I agree. But eventually Nate will piss off Democrats by predicting a Republican in a close race. |
|
|
| (1006254) | |
Re: Nate Silver is Golden |
|
|
Posted by DANd124 on Wed Nov 7 01:01:19 2012, in response to Re: Nate Silver is Golden, posted by AlM on Wed Nov 7 01:00:33 2012. Democrats were pissed at him in 2010... |
|
|
| (1006255) | |
Re: Nate Silver is Golden |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Nov 7 01:01:30 2012, in response to Re: Nate Silver is Golden, posted by AlM on Wed Nov 7 01:00:33 2012. Of course a lot of Democrats don't get it either. They just have no reason to complain yet. |
|
|
| (1006263) | |
Re: Nate Silver |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Wed Nov 7 01:04:37 2012, in response to Re: Nate Silver, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Nov 7 01:00:14 2012. he is now proven commodity. I always figured Nate The Great needed two Presidential elections to solidify himself. |
|
|
| (1006270) | |
Re: Nate Silver is Golden |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Nov 7 01:07:16 2012, in response to Re: Nate Silver is Golden, posted by AlM on Wed Nov 7 01:00:33 2012. Math is a mighty nonpartisan factor ... |
|
|
| (1006290) | |
Re: Nate Silver |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Nov 7 01:21:47 2012, in response to Re: Nate Silver, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Nov 7 01:04:37 2012. LOL at Rasmussen. :) |
|
|
| (1006307) | |
Re: Nate Silver |
|
|
Posted by LuchAAA on Wed Nov 7 01:27:21 2012, in response to Re: Nate Silver, posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Nov 7 01:21:47 2012. why? i did not check it today but saw headline that he had a tie or Romney ahead by one. |
|
|
| (1006345) | |
Re: Nate Silver |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Wed Nov 7 01:42:01 2012, in response to Re: Nate Silver, posted by LuchAAA on Wed Nov 7 01:27:21 2012. Remember ... RAS always fixes their bad numbers in the final week. Whoops. :) |
|
|
| (1006620) | |
Re: Nate Silver is Golden |
|
|
Posted by Jersey Mike on Wed Nov 7 08:20:22 2012, in response to Re: Nate Silver is Golden, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed Nov 7 00:52:29 2012. It works by MATH.
|
|
|
| (1006626) | |
Re: Nate Silver |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Wed Nov 7 08:31:52 2012, in response to Nate Silver, posted by DANd124 on Wed Nov 7 00:17:35 2012. Poor Nate and happy Democrats. For Senate it seems likely he has gotten ND and MT wrong. |
|
|
| (1006635) | |
Re: Nate Silver |
|
|
Posted by AMoreira81 on Wed Nov 7 08:41:34 2012, in response to Re: Nate Silver, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Nov 7 00:35:38 2012. If you have evidence that the election was not won cleanly---please present it with video, audio, or photographic evidence. Unsubstantiated claims divide America. |
|
|
| (2013840) | |
Re: Nate Silver |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Mar 27 14:08:55 2025, in response to Re: Nate Silver, posted by Olog-hai on Wed Nov 7 00:35:38 2012. In retrospective, this is exactly what it sounds like. |
|
|