|
|
| Re: GWU Law Prof Wants 19 Member Supreme Court (952756) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: GWU Law Prof Wants 19 Member Supreme Court |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Mon Jun 25 10:42:38 2012, in response to Re: GWU Law Prof Wants 19 Member Supreme Court, posted by SLRT on Sun Jun 24 20:15:01 2012. You obviously don't know the law or medicine. First, there is no inherent "right" to choose to terminate a pregnancy in the 3rd trimester. Roe itself designated such rights to the first trimester and in some cases the second. After that, it is limited to medically necessary cases.There is no such thing as "partial birth abortion". The outlawed procedure is called D&X and it is done completely in utero, does not involve any variety of "birth" and is the less invasive, less likely to have complications that could affect the ability of the woman (who is involved here, something the RW seems to forget, there's an already living human person involved) to have a successful future pregnancy. Should a patient faced with a life threatening medical problem get the best possible care to resolve that problem? The RW doesn't think so. |
|
|
|