|
|
| Re: GWU Law Prof Wants 19 Member Supreme Court (952715) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: GWU Law Prof Wants 19 Member Supreme Court |
|
|
Posted by bingbong on Sun Jun 24 18:58:11 2012, in response to Re: GWU Law Prof Wants 19 Member Supreme Court, posted by Chris R16/R2730 on Sun Jun 24 17:52:40 2012. THis is not the same court. The Rhenquist court was close ideologically to this one, but not quite as activist.Howeverbush v Gore was a completely political decision, as the Constitution does not allow the Federal government to interfere in states' election issues until all possibilities for resolution have been exhausted at the state level. The state court ordered a recount, well within their powers. SCOTUS blindsided America and stopped it before it could be completed. Corporations aren't people. They have no such right. Citizens is a bad decision that should be either legislated or retried away. (note they didn't exist in modern form, which is a liability hedge,in those days. Business owners were personally responsible and liable for their losses) |
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|