|
|
| Re: Non-sequitar: Re: Why the ''unintended conseqences'' of Sharia Law bans should be welcome (942060) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Non-sequitar: Re: Why the ''unintended conseqences'' of Sharia Law bans should be welcome |
|
|
Posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Wed May 16 11:30:49 2012, in response to Re: Non-sequitar: Re: Why the ''unintended conseqences'' of Sharia Law bans should be welcome, posted by Spider-Pig on Wed May 16 09:16:38 2012. I read the whole thing. The article did talk about how victims are encouraged to go before a rabbinical court instead.One victim was urged to go to a bet din instead of a secular court. Reading the supporting documents, it becomes clearer that Rabbi Hager's "rabbinical court" was code for buying the victim off for $20,000. The documents also contain rulings from other batei din ordering victims to report abuse to proper secular authorities. |
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|