|
|
| Re: Attorney in hijab defends call for other women at 9/11 hearing to wear 'appropriate' clothing (939311) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Attorney in hijab defends call for other women at 9/11 hearing to wear 'appropriate' clothing |
|
|
Posted by SLRT on Mon May 7 14:15:25 2012, in response to Re: Attorney in hijab defends call for other women at 9/11 hearing to wear 'appropriate' clothing, posted by SMAZ on Mon May 7 14:07:10 2012. Oh, please. When a liberal begins to use the terms of nobility for "warrior" to try to say that the terrorists should be tried in civilian court, it becomes embarrassing.A war crime is a crime committed in contravention of the Laws of War. What are we looking for, bringing Conan the Sumarian to trial? The Geneva and Hague Conventions deal with "combatants." You can be a privileged combatant, and have certain protections, such as for the fact that you can kill other combatants and not be a murderer, or you can be a non-privileged combatant. Either way, you can commit war crimes. And they did. And where the hell do you get the idea that Courts-Martial are more lenient than civilian courts? |
|
|
|