|
|
| Re: The Evolution of Bisexuality (in Women) and Homosexuality (in Men) (781925) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: The Evolution of Bisexuality (in Women) and Homosexuality (in Men) |
|
|
Posted by JayMan on Wed May 18 15:55:01 2011, in response to Re: The Evolution of Bisexuality (in Women) and Homosexuality (in Men), posted by SMAZ on Wed May 18 13:28:29 2011. In the past people had lots of kids which meant that on balance a family would be more even matched between boys and girls if they've got 6-8 kids.With people just having a couple of kids nowadays, if what you say is true, it means that such traits would only be valid for the first and second-borns. Kanazawa controlled for sibship size in his studies. Attractive women still have more girls. Even still, if you're saying higher sibships would produce more boys, then your hypothesis is that there is a tilt for girls in earlier borns but boys in later borns in attractive women. That's slightly harder to explain, and perhaps unnecessarily complicated. Six of the last nine POTUSs (and last three in a row) have only had girls. 1. Nine couples isn't a significant sample. 2. Clinton only had one child, not enough to be meaningful. 3. Many of the First Ladies were fairly attractive women in their prime. |
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|