|
|
| Re: Palin's 17 year old daughter pregnant. (350874) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Palin's 17 year old daughter pregnant. |
|
|
Posted by JournalSquare-K-Car on Tue Sep 2 22:49:59 2008, in response to Re: Palin's 17 year old daughter pregnant., posted by JohnL on Tue Sep 2 21:53:10 2008. How do you explain ****MAXWELL'S DEMON****?We have gotten into this arguement before, and I don't think I will budge. I agree with the observations of Newton, but I stop short of calling them laws, sorry. And the conversion of energy to mass and vice versa is also something that I am debunking(specifically C is MAS of the universe, and things approaching C increase in weight, and such.). If it were true, by the way, an anomaly in which energy CAN be created and destroyed would be possible. Maybe I will explain further in another post, I have to go to sleep now. It is just that there isn't enough SOLID evidence for those ideas, and I have a feeling some scientists are corrupt, and make chit up. Ever read about the guy who claimed the discovery of gravitational waves? They recently sent a probe into outer space with a rotating glass ball. Supposedly, if the rotation changes a certain way, it will prove some sort of gravitational vortex theory. They ALREADY HAVE THE DATA!!!! They aren't releasing it....they are probably screing up the numbers. Oh, and the Michaelson and Morely experiments do not completely PROVE that C is MAS, either |
|
|
|