|
|
| Re: Hillary's Candid View of the Electorate (202438) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Hillary's Candid View of the Electorate |
|
|
Posted by SelkirkTMO on Sun Mar 18 12:44:12 2007, in response to Re: Hillary's Candid View of the Electorate, posted by Dan Lawrence on Sun Mar 18 12:01:33 2007. Ignoring Train Dude's "rainman" response ... INTERESTING point ... I was a member of the "LaRouche" party (libertarians made that disappear faster than you can say "Dianetics", heh) I *WENT* for Libertarian because instead of the usual political "cross-sectioning" it allowed for FISCAL conservatism without NAZIism as far as social angles went ... and was focused on the ORIGINAL "sales rap" of America being ALL about FREEDOM to do WHATEVER you wanted SO LONG AS you did no harm to OTHERS. PERFECT "upstate politics" ... don't spend money you don't HAVE and unless I'm a threat to my neighbors, LEAVE ME THE PHUCK ALONE. I don't NEED yer damned "services" I can take care of MYSELF. And yet, I realize (owning 1 3/4 mile highway that I own and must take care of) that there ARE some things the people CANNOT do for themselves (Hillary post) and that government MUST be there to do in order to FAIRLY share those expenses (defense and stopping large bullies like Halliburton and MOB-ON Oil and such from PHUCKING us all) ... LaRouch (uh, libertarian) made EMINENT sense to me away from socialist NYC ...But LIBERTARIAN is nothing more than the usual scam ... KATO Institute ... there's no balance there ... LIBERTARIAN was nothing more than yet another wrong-wing "surrender monkey" to GHOULIANI, CHENEY and the usual suspects. :( |
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|