|
|
| Re: Arthur Engoron (1956683) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Arthur Engoron |
|
|
Posted by mtk52983 on Fri Sep 29 06:21:11 2023, in response to Re: Arthur Engoron, posted by Train Dude on Thu Sep 28 22:54:09 2023. I wouldn’t consider it as such in this case. While AlM was incorrect, I have seen attorneys cite the 3211 standard on a 3212 motion and vice versa (as well as their counterparts in Federal Court). |
|
|
|