|
|
| Re: He was in my class (185477) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: He was in my class |
|
|
Posted by orange blossom special on Wed Jan 17 14:55:49 2007, in response to Re: He was in my class, posted by GP38/R42 Chris on Wed Jan 17 12:52:48 2007. Those are condo's, very expensive. At least you're next to a 7-11 but nothing else. The towers.Your definition of urban is similiar to mine. If I posted a photo of grid-streets with single homes and nice lawns, maybe sidewalks, then those aren't the same as that speedway I posted with the crappy apartments or subdivisons. That's entirely two different worlds. That's where my suburbian/exurbian demarcation is. Since the road I posted were mostly apartments, it's slightly denser. Still impossible to walk, mail, newspaper. Not the same lifestyle as pre 1970's suburbs. Somewhere between 1970-80 they forgot how to build cities. But I can find streetcar or even motorcar suburbs from turn of the century(the last one) that's still pure surburbian. So somewhere after 1980, they completely screwed up in my mind! |
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|