|
|
| Re: Not a Word About The Supreme Court Today? (1749106) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Not a Word About The Supreme Court Today? |
|
|
Posted by Henry R32 #3730 on Tue Jul 7 01:30:06 2020, in response to Re: Not a Word About The Supreme Court Today?, posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Jul 7 00:11:00 2020. Yes, opposite to the state's popular vote.The dispute over the electors would be tied up in court. One way to proceed would be to ignore that state's electors and proceed with the election without them... which would result in no candidate having a majority, merely a plurality, sending it to the house. I used this article as a basis which shows how Trump could retain control even after losing the electoral vote. The reason I used $candidate was there is no reason the same couldn't occur with a Democrat state legislature gumming things up in favor of Biden. When that inevitably fails there would be much pissing and moaning. Thus Trump would be the ultimate victor regardless of who won, and it could trigger the civil war. |
|
|
|