|
|
| Re: Not a Word About The Supreme Court Today? (1748814) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Not a Word About The Supreme Court Today? |
|
|
Posted by Sand Box John on Mon Jul 6 14:54:55 2020, in response to Re: Not a Word About The Supreme Court Today?, posted by AlM on Mon Jul 6 14:02:25 2020. You have it backward. It allows a state to appoint electors who are bound by the NPVIC rules.The problem with that interpretation is that it goes against the candidate that won the popular vote in the electors state. John in the sand box of Maryland's eastern shore. |
|
|
|