|
|
| Re: REAL Police Reform (1746347) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: REAL Police Reform |
|
|
Posted by Henry R32 #3730 on Mon Jun 29 15:33:04 2020, in response to REAL Police Reform, posted by JayZeeBMT on Mon Jun 29 12:51:49 2020. (1) Yes.I do think police should know the laws they are enforcing. If that's (2), I can get behind it. (3) No, but I don't like federal oversight of anything. State oversight I can get behind. (4) I like what Colorado has done to bypass qualified immunity, if a cop violates your civil rights, they are responsible for a minimum of $25,000 in damages. (5) No. There are lots of bad reasons why a cop might be fired - refusing to enforce an unconstitutional law, making a controversial social media post, or getting railroaded after snitching on bad cops. Going to a new department with a better culture should be an option. (6) *Shrug* it's situational. I think the most militarized my local cops are is a single M4 rifle in case things really get heavy. Major cities might need an APC or two. (7) Policing against the students I can get behind, but they need to be there to deter outside threats, like at this Oregon school. If we can have an armed guard in a bank to defend money, we should have an armed guard (at least) in a school to defend kids. |
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|