|
|
| Re: Eric Ciaramella (1693299) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Eric Ciaramella |
|
|
Posted by AlM on Sat Jan 25 08:43:52 2020, in response to Re: Eric Ciaramella, posted by Henry R32 #3730 on Sat Jan 25 01:01:30 2020. A legitimate journalism outlet has repeatedly published the name after reverse-engineering details from the NY Times.OK, no criminal activity in that. There is of course the risk that other people meet the criteria but weren't findable by the outlet's methods. In that case, they are putting someone at risk, which would be irresponsible even if not illegal. By the way, there is nothing that says a whistleblower has to be ideologically neutral. If you have been told by others that the president has committed a crime, you can pass that on to the inspector general no matter what your personal views of the president might be. Again, everything the whistleblower has claimed has now been testified to by Republicans in open hearings. |
|
|
|