|
|
| Re: Should your state force vaccines on your children? (1656594) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Should your state force vaccines on your children? |
|
|
Posted by Henry R32 #3730 on Sat Sep 14 05:08:35 2019, in response to Re: Should your state force vaccines on your children?, posted by AlM on Fri Sep 13 07:39:48 2019. New York's, which according to a fact checker,After 24 weeks, such decisions must be made with a determination that there is an “absence of fetal viability” or that the procedure is “necessary to protect the patient’s life or health.” Sounds non-controversial until you realize how vague the term "health" is. New York’s new law does not explicitly define “health.” In what is considered a companion case, Doe v. Bolton, the U.S. Supreme Court held that “medical judgment may be exercised in the light of all factors — physical, emotional, psychological, familial, and the woman’s age — relevant to the wellbeing of the patient. All these factors may relate to health. This allows the attending physician the room he needs to make his best medical judgment.” Those three terms I bolded in the middle are pretty darned vague. And remember, from a religious/right perspective, they are babies, and a justification of 'emotional health' for murder seems fairly hollow. |
|
|
|