|Re: Mayor of Los Angeles speaks (1643313)|
|Home > OTChat|
Re: Mayor of Los Angeles speaks
Posted by Olog-hai on Thu Jul 25 10:16:43 2019, in response to Re: Ology of Terror V, posted by DAnD124 on Wed Jul 24 20:17:25 2019.You still too cowardly to register on that other website? What a wuss.
Ever read the constitutions of the USSR and Red China? Since you like bringing up subjects like these, let's compare the ERA's wording with those.
That's the ERA, and it does give Congress the power to attack the Bill of Rights wherever they perceive "inequality". Now for the 1936 USSR constitution:
Article 122: Women in the USSR are accorded equal rights with men in all spheres of economic, state, cultural, social and political life. The possibility of exercising these rights is ensured to women by granting them an equal right with men to work, payment for work, rest and leisure, social insurance and education, and by state protection of the interests of mother and child, pre-maternity and maternity leave with full pay, and the provision of a wide network of maternity homes, nurseries and kindergartens.Sound like the Democrats of today?
Now for the 1977 USSR constitution.
Article 35. Women and men have equal rights in the USSR.The PRC's constitution, still very much in force.
Article 48. Equal rights for womenAll of the above are used to attack freedom of religion for starters, but also that of private property and all the other freedoms listed in the Bill of Rights. History is laden with proof after proof; ignore at your own peril.
And just for ha-has, here's Article 19 of the present-day Russian Federation's constitution:
The language in there is very much like the language of the former USSR constitutions. (And it's laughable that many on the left claim that Trump wants to emulate this, lol.)
(There are no responses to this message.)