Re: why are there no thriving ''sub-saharan'' black nations? (1423841) | |||
![]() |
|||
Home > OTChat | |||
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
![]() |
Re: why are there no thriving ''sub-saharan'' black nations? |
|
Posted by ftgreeneg on Sat Mar 11 20:27:38 2017, in response to Re: why are there no thriving ''sub-saharan'' black nations?, posted by LuchAAA on Sat Mar 11 20:19:52 2017. Well it's definitely true for Australia (which was actually where England sent its prisoners), Ireland it depends on whose colonizing you're talking about. Wasn't really developed bf being colonized by the Romans. Then again Romans developed much of Europe. |
![]() |
(There are no responses to this message.)
![]() |
![]() |