|
|
| Re: Question (1398093) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Question |
|
|
Posted by Charles G on Wed Oct 12 17:21:35 2016, in response to Re: Question, posted by AlM on Wed Oct 12 16:29:48 2016. You have quite selectively edited your quotes. Let me help you.AlM: Even if Hillary said exactly the words that she is quoted as saying, they could be taken many ways. There is more evidence that Trump called for the assassination of Clinton than there is that Clinton intimidated Broaddrick. Charles G: I suspect that women's groups would strongly disagree with your interpretation If Hillary said exactly the words she is quoted as saying, women's groups would certainly argue that Clinton was attempting to intimidate Broaddrick. Even if you omit your "Even if..." qualifier, there cannot be more evidence that Trump called for the assassination of Clinton because there is zero evidence that he did any such thing. The statements you reference were made in public and picked up by thousands and perhaps millions of people. If there were any evidence whatsoever that he was actually calling for an assassination attempt, he would be facing charges. When you make statements like that, you've just fallen into the parroting the talking points trap. You're usually better than that. If anything has happened in this evening's discourse, it is that you have attempted to avoid answering the original question I posed to you by attempting to change the subject. It did not go unnoticed. |
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|