Home · Maps · About

Home > OTChat
 

[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[ First in Thread | Next in Thread ]

 

view flat

Re: The Donald vs Ramos

Posted by bingbong on Fri Aug 28 14:22:22 2015, in response to Re: The Donald vs Ramos, posted by mtk52983 on Fri Aug 28 14:10:59 2015.

fiogf49gjkf0d
That's a safety measure. Simple common sense. not to mention truly looking out for one's family. If a loaded unlocked gun is in the home the chances of accidental shooting multiples.

Guns can be transported legally through secured transportation networks. Point to point is fine, with documentation as to to and from points, in a secured vehicle. Hunters have licenses to carry from vehicles to woods where they set up. The public health risk here is the armed idiot in Starbucks. I prefer peace with my coffee.

There is no, nor was there ever intended to be an unfettered right to have a gun. It was always intended to be regulated. In fact, among the first laws created in this new nation, gun control figured significantly. Training was required, as well as registration. Anyone could look up the record and see who owned exactly what. Nowadays, any asshole with enough money can get one and kill people recklessly. Time for that to end.

The rights of those who wish to live free from guns has long been overdue.

Responses

Post a New Response

Your Handle:

Your Password:

E-Mail Address:

Subject:

Message:



Before posting.. think twice!


[ Return to the Message Index ]