|
|
| Re: White Privilege Responsible for Baltimore Riots (1291737) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: White Privilege Responsible for Baltimore Riots |
|
|
Posted by Nilet on Fri May 29 04:47:45 2015, in response to Re: White Privilege Responsible for Baltimore Riots, posted by R2Chinatown on Fri May 29 01:01:28 2015. You asked what is essentially a question of fact. Facts exist independently of whoever provided them to you.You made a racist post. You demanded to know why it was racist. I informed you why it was racist. You have now been informed, and you now know why your post was racist. Pretending that the explanation doesn't count because it didn't come from the "right" person is disingenuous. Maybe your reading comprehension problems are what make you come across as arrogant and a phony. This statement is absurd— it makes absolutely no attempt to be accurate, but does range from unmistakeably wrong to not even wrong. First, there is the implied claim that I have reading comprehension problems. This is obviously false. I'm one of the few people here who doesn't have reading comprehension problems. Second, there is the claim that I'm "arrogant." This is also obviously false. I am in no way arrogant. However, it is a fairly common occurrence for the mentally defective to mistake being right for being "arrogant" and since I tend to be right (at least compared to the average SubChatter; a low bar admittedly), they often use accusations of "arrogance" to try to deflect from the fact that they've been proven wrong. That I often respond to such accusations by condescendingly explaining the simple facts only cements their belief that I'm "arrogant," but because I only offer such condescending explanations to people who are already irrational it doesn't meet any meaningful definition of arrogance. And finally, the claim that I am a "phony" is not even wrong. This pseudo-statement cannot be considered false for the simple reason that it is too incoherent to have a truth value at all. |
|
(There are no responses to this message.)
|
|