Re: ACA could be undone by wording ''glitch''? (1219215)		Home · Maps · About
Home > OTChat
	[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] [ First in Thread | Next in Thread ]

view flat

Re: ACA could be undone by wording ''glitch''?

Posted by Spider-Pig on Tue Aug 26 09:59:41 2014, in response to Re: ACA could be undone by wording ''glitch''?, posted by bingbong on Tue Aug 26 09:58:35 2014. fiogf49gjkf0d You don't get it. In the event this clause is found to be binding, then they could well find the entire act is unconstitutional.

Responses

• Re: ACA could be undone by wording ''glitch''? - bingbong - Tue Aug 26 10:51:28 2014
  • Re: ACA could be undone by wording ''glitch''? - Dave - Tue Aug 26 11:46:21 2014
    • Re: ACA could be undone by wording ''glitch''? - bingbong - Tue Aug 26 12:13:24 2014
      • Re: ACA could be undone by wording ''glitch''? - Dave - Tue Aug 26 12:29:29 2014
        • Re: ACA could be undone by wording ''glitch''? - bingbong - Tue Aug 26 14:44:21 2014
          • Re: ACA could be undone by wording ''glitch''? - Dave - Tue Aug 26 14:58:01 2014
            • Re: ACA could be undone by wording ''glitch''? - bingbong - Tue Aug 26 15:03:54 2014
              • Re: ACA could be undone by wording ''glitch''? - Dave - Tue Aug 26 18:14:14 2014
                • Re: ACA could be undone by wording ''glitch''? - bingbong - Tue Aug 26 22:02:59 2014
                  • Re: ACA could be undone by wording ''glitch''? - Dave - Wed Aug 27 07:46:12 2014

Post a New Response