|
|
| Re: How ''Binding'' is Vatican II? (1176356) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: How ''Binding'' is Vatican II? |
|
|
Posted by kew gardens teleport on Sun Apr 20 13:59:08 2014, in response to How "Binding" is Vatican II?, posted by Mitch45 on Sun Apr 20 12:53:33 2014. Are any of the other Christian denominations bound by any of the provisions of Vatican II?No way. We don't want Vatican I, Trent, Lateran I-V, Basel-Ferrara-Florence, Constance, Vienne, Lyons I-II, or the RC version of Constantinople IV either. We absolutely do not condone the Bishop of Rome's pretended infallibility, the officially-sanctioned mariolatry, Jesuitry, the condemnation of the Pragmatic Sanction, the establishment of pawn shops, the pretended supremacy and Petrine succession of the Bishop of Rome, the death sentence passed on John Hus, Philip IV of France's little spat with the Knights Templar, dodgy deals with the Ilkhan Emperor, the deposition of Frederick II, dubious definitions of the Real Presence, auricular confession, imposition of special dress on Muslims and Jews, the special procedures for the election of the Bishop of Rome by the red-hat brigade rather than the diocese, the notion that ordinations made by antipopes are invalid, clerical celibacy, different standards of evidence at law for Jews, prohibitions against gender-mixed monasteries, the pointless prohibition on going into Benevento with an army, the indulgence for those who fund crusades, and the Bishop of Rome's pretended deposition of the Patriarch Photius of Constantinople. All these pseudo-councils are exercises in corruption and reprehensibility. |
|
|
|