|
|
| Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack (1067582) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > OTChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack |
|
|
Posted by Train Dude on Thu May 23 18:40:50 2013, in response to Re: Muslims behead man in brutal south London attack, posted by Fred G on Thu May 23 18:33:33 2013. So lets assume Reagan was 100% wrong and should have launched an all out assault and didn't, how does that justify the "soft on terrorists" policy of the ball-mess weasel-in-chief that we expect leadership from. The FBI has had 18 suspects under surveillance since the Benghazi attack. The "president" wants enough evidence so they can be convicted in a civilian trial. Why have they not been targeted by drones.The Ft. Hood terrorist is being charged with workplace violence. He continues to draw a full salary while the victims and the country suffer through endless motions and delays because this "president" is afraid to confront terrorism. Where is the retaliation? If you want to use Reagan as an excuse, then I suppose that no president, now or in the future should ever respond to terrorism. |
|
|
|