SubChat.com: OTChat

Re: Food for Thought For Liberals (Train Dude)

Fri, 3 Jul 2009 03:01:20 GMT

Posted by Train Dude on 7/2/2009 10:01:20 PM EST
Nonsense fred. Reverend Wright almost derailed barack obama and obama had to disavow Wright's statements.

Re: Food for Thought For Liberals (SMAZ)

Fri, 3 Jul 2009 03:01:15 GMT

Posted by SMAZ on 7/2/2009 10:01:15 PM EST
When does that 2010 schedulue come out? Ask the IRS.

Re: Food for Thought For Liberals (Fred G)

Fri, 3 Jul 2009 02:58:25 GMT

Posted by Fred G on 7/2/2009 9:58:25 PM EST
Those minority voters only revised their voting habits, as in actually going out to vote, not their affiliation or verbal choice if asked. your pal, Fred

Re: Breaking news from Queensbridge (Easy)

Fri, 3 Jul 2009 02:57:34 GMT

Posted by Easy on 7/2/2009 9:57:34 PM EST
Ron Artest, who nearly derailed the Los Angeles Lakers� championship drive, will apparently be joining them for the next joy ride through the playoffs. Let the riots begin! Might as well give the Lakers a repeat if they resign Odom.

Breaking news from Queensbridge (Easy)

Fri, 3 Jul 2009 02:56:20 GMT

Posted by Easy on 7/2/2009 9:56:20 PM EST
NY Times

Re: Food for Thought For Liberals (SMAZ)

Fri, 3 Jul 2009 02:54:55 GMT

Posted by SMAZ on 7/2/2009 9:54:55 PM EST
Yes, it is funny when he thinks a communist society will do him better than a capitalistic one. He can always move to China. Wow! I didn't realize that pointing out how unregulated Wall St excesses led to systemic financial failure and a subsequent bailout by the US Treasury made one a communist Mr. McCarthy. And here I was thinking that privatized gains, socialized losses and corporate entities that are "too big to fail" were all anti-capitalist features.

Re: Food for Thought For Liberals (Fred G)

Fri, 3 Jul 2009 02:50:38 GMT

Posted by Fred G on 7/2/2009 9:50:38 PM EST
That's a tit-for-tat-spiteful but inaccurate comparison. Let's start with the fact that Republican congressmen and even the head of the RNC have apologized for remarks made about Rush Limbaugh. We've not seen either Revs Wright or Sharpton have that kind of clout with the Democrats. Limbaugh is an entertainer yes, but a lot of fringe types take it as gospel. I included him for ballbusting value. Gingrich and Cheney have lately been the face of the GOP though. your pal, Fred

Re: Food for Thought For Liberals (Train Dude)

Fri, 3 Jul 2009 02:47:02 GMT

Posted by Train Dude on 7/2/2009 9:47:02 PM EST
Your example is meaningless. The NFL is one organization in which there is 100% employment. If you don't like revenue sharing - that's another story but it is not even remotely relevent to this discussion.

Re: Food for Thought For Liberals (Train Dude)

Fri, 3 Jul 2009 02:44:17 GMT

Posted by Train Dude on 7/2/2009 9:44:17 PM EST
For the same reason that you and the moron minions here insist that Rush Limbaugh speaks for republicans or Conservatives.

Re: Food for Thought For Liberals (R PansePCC)

Fri, 3 Jul 2009 02:42:21 GMT

Posted by R PansePCC on 7/2/2009 9:42:21 PM EST
I never said it was. I was just providing an example that shows that in some cases you can increase your wealth by dividing it.