|
|
| Get Ready for the M55 (316710) | |
 |
|
| Home > BusChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
|
| (316711) | |
Re: Get Ready for the M55 |
|
|
Posted by gOld_12th on Sun Jul 24 00:05:36 2016, in response to Get Ready for the M55, posted by Bill from Maspeth on Sat Jul 23 23:25:51 2016. January 2017 is the start date of the split. |
|
|
| (316716) | |
Re: Get Ready for the M55 |
|
|
Posted by SI 93 on Sun Jul 24 07:07:21 2016, in response to Re: Get Ready for the M55, posted by gOld_12th on Sun Jul 24 00:05:36 2016. What about the M1 being extended south of 8th St and Broadway to Worth St, I'm surprised that this wasn't mentioned at all. |
|
|
| (316719) | |
Re: Get Ready for the M55 |
|
|
Posted by gOld_12th on Sun Jul 24 10:01:09 2016, in response to Re: Get Ready for the M55, posted by SI 93 on Sun Jul 24 07:07:21 2016. No, Chipper_10 |
|
|
| (316731) | |
Re: Get Ready for the M55 |
|
|
Posted by Dan on Sun Jul 24 14:14:14 2016, in response to Get Ready for the M55, posted by Bill from Maspeth on Sat Jul 23 23:25:51 2016. Any SI or Brooklyn changes in the works? |
|
|
| (316734) | |
Re: Get Ready for the M55 |
|
|
Posted by randyo on Sun Jul 24 17:15:20 2016, in response to Get Ready for the M55, posted by Bill from Maspeth on Sat Jul 23 23:25:51 2016. I think that shortlining the M5 at 31 St is a bit extreme considering that the service ran as far as 8 St and even Houston St seemingly without problems. Maybe South Ferry was a bit too long but either 8 St or Houston would probably be OK. |
|
|
| (316740) | |
Re: Get Ready for the M55 |
|
|
Posted by Bill from Maspeth on Sun Jul 24 20:59:51 2016, in response to Re: Get Ready for the M55, posted by gOld_12th on Sun Jul 24 00:05:36 2016. I sit corrected. |
|
|
| (316781) | |
Re: Get Ready for the M55 |
|
|
Posted by B1bus on Tue Jul 26 00:29:43 2016, in response to Re: Get Ready for the M55, posted by randyo on Sun Jul 24 17:15:20 2016. They do not want overlapping, like cutting M10 to 59 st.. |
|
|
| (316819) | |
Re: Get Ready for the M55 |
|
|
Posted by randyo on Wed Jul 27 16:03:05 2016, in response to Re: Get Ready for the M55, posted by B1bus on Tue Jul 26 00:29:43 2016. Sometimes a certain amount of overlapping is necessary for passenger convenience. |
|
|
| (316826) | |
Re: Get Ready for the M55 |
|
|
Posted by checkmatechamp13 on Wed Jul 27 22:33:42 2016, in response to Re: Get Ready for the M55, posted by randyo on Wed Jul 27 16:03:05 2016. They said 88% of current passengers wouldn't need to transfer under this proposal. To push it so the remaining 12% wouldn't need to transfer is more trouble than it's worth. |
|
|
| (316827) | |
Re: Get Ready for the M55 |
|
|
Posted by checkmatechamp13 on Wed Jul 27 22:35:39 2016, in response to Re: Get Ready for the M55, posted by SI 93 on Sun Jul 24 07:07:21 2016. They probably figured the M55 is enough, especially going up to 44th Street. There would be a direct connection from the heart of 5th Avenue to the lower Broadway corridor. |
|
|
| (316828) | |
Re: Get Ready for the M55 |
|
|
Posted by checkmatechamp13 on Wed Jul 27 22:35:43 2016, in response to Re: Get Ready for the M55, posted by SI 93 on Sun Jul 24 07:07:21 2016. They probably figured the M55 is enough, especially going up to 44th Street. There would be a direct connection from the heart of 5th Avenue to the lower Broadway corridor. |
|
|