|
|
| Re: Proof supplied but ignored (313231) | |
 |
|
| Home > BusChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 23 of 24 |
||
|
| (315963) | |
Re: Proof supplied but ignored |
|
|
Posted by TerrApin Station on Mon Jul 11 19:15:11 2016, in response to Re: Proof supplied but ignored, posted by BrooklynBus on Mon Jul 11 10:22:40 2016. He didn't say that AFAIK. |
|
|
| (315964) | |
Re: Proof supplied but ignored |
|
|
Posted by BrooklynBus on Mon Jul 11 19:16:18 2016, in response to Re: Proof supplied but ignored, posted by RIPTA42HopeTunnel on Mon Jul 11 12:00:52 2016. No. I wasn't talking about the 25 mph speed limit and wasn't using any hyperbole.Read again what he said. He said that preventing pedestrian deaths shoukd receive the highest priority and other consequences like economic impacts were irrelevant. So we shoukd do everything possible to prevent every pedestrian death. The implication is that if banning all Otis vehicles was the way to accomplish that, it would be perfectly fine. |
|
|
| (315965) | |
Re: Proof supplied but ignored |
|
|
Posted by TerrApin Station on Mon Jul 11 19:17:15 2016, in response to Re: Proof supplied but ignored, posted by BrooklynBus on Mon Jul 11 10:24:21 2016. Huh? No I'm not where did I say it was specifically wrong? This isn't even the thread about the B44!! So why worked I start discussing it here? My posts here follow the subject of the ones that precede them. |
|
|
| (315967) | |
Re: Proof supplied but ignored |
|
|
Posted by BrooklynBus on Mon Jul 11 19:28:12 2016, in response to Re: Proof supplied but ignored, posted by TerrApin Station on Mon Jul 11 18:58:07 2016. Untrue. |
|
|
| (315968) | |
Re: Proof supplied but ignored |
|
|
Posted by TerrApin Station on Mon Jul 11 19:33:25 2016, in response to Re: Proof supplied but ignored, posted by BrooklynBus on Mon Jul 11 19:28:12 2016. I'll make you a bet. Loser has to leave BusChat for 3 months. Name the way I can prove you wrong and then I'll tell you if I can meet that burden of proff. Then the bet will begin. |
|
|
| (315969) | |
Re: Proof supplied but ignored |
|
|
Posted by nostalgia on Mon Jul 11 20:39:27 2016, in response to Re: Proof supplied but ignored, posted by TerrApin Station on Mon Jul 11 19:33:25 2016. Nobody can trust you live up to these terms if you lost. But then, you would NEVER admit you were wrong so why have a bet? |
|
|
| (315970) | |
Re: Proof supplied but ignored |
|
|
Posted by TerrApin Station on Mon Jul 11 20:43:19 2016, in response to Re: Proof supplied but ignored, posted by nostalgia on Mon Jul 11 20:39:27 2016. How do planes fly.... |
|
|
| (315971) | |
Re: Proof supplied but ignored |
|
|
Posted by nostalgia on Mon Jul 11 21:11:50 2016, in response to Re: Proof supplied but ignored, posted by TerrApin Station on Mon Jul 11 20:43:19 2016. An usual non sequitur |
|
|
| (315972) | |
Re: Proof supplied but ignored |
|
|
Posted by TerrApin Station on Mon Jul 11 21:42:44 2016, in response to Re: Proof supplied but ignored, posted by nostalgia on Mon Jul 11 21:11:50 2016. ???? |
|
|
| (315974) | |
Re: Waiting for proof |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Jul 12 00:49:47 2016, in response to Re: Waiting for proof, posted by BrooklynBus on Mon Jul 11 10:32:18 2016. No he was not right and you just said so.Yes he was right and no I did not just say he was not. That is what I said and it's not my problem that you do not know how to read.Maybe that's what you meant, but it's not what you said. You clearly stated that car drivers' time is worth more than bus riders' time because the car drivers' have a higher income. You doubt they didn't consider the cost to others. YES YOU DOUBT IT BE AUSE YOU NEVER READ ANY OF THE REPORTS.No, I doubt it because of your track record of being wrong and DOT's track record of providing relevant info on cars. For example, DOT provided the change in travel time for cars along Woodhaven. Yet you are still the expert in your mind.I never said I was the expert. |
|
|
| (315975) | |
Re: Waiting for proof |
|
|
Posted by nostalgia on Tue Jul 12 06:46:29 2016, in response to Re: Waiting for proof, posted by Terrapin Station on Tue Jul 12 00:49:47 2016. I never said I was the expert.But you act like one finding fault with just about everything Bus writes. I'm sure glad you missed the thread I started. |
|
|
| (315976) | |
Re: Waiting for proof |
|
|
Posted by TerrApin Station on Tue Jul 12 07:29:29 2016, in response to Re: Waiting for proof, posted by nostalgia on Tue Jul 12 06:46:29 2016. No I don't. I act like someone with common sense, logic, and analytic skills. There are many people here like that. You were wrong. I never said I'm the expert.I missed nothing. You're just pissed that you were wrong. |
|
|
| (315977) | |
Re: Waiting for proof |
|
|
Posted by nostalgia on Tue Jul 12 07:34:06 2016, in response to Re: Waiting for proof, posted by TerrApin Station on Tue Jul 12 07:29:29 2016. I'm NOT wrong. I don't see many people with common sense, logic, and analytic skills attacking Bus like you do.Note: I NEVER called you an expert, Goebbels |
|
|
| (315978) | |
Re: Waiting for proof |
|
|
Posted by TerrApin Station on Tue Jul 12 09:09:00 2016, in response to Re: Waiting for proof, posted by nostalgia on Tue Jul 12 07:34:06 2016. You were wrong. And you are wrong. LOL! He's not attacked. He's corrected. You brought up expert, not me. LOL! Please do continue! |
|
|
| (315979) | |
Re: Waiting for proof |
|
|
Posted by nostalgia on Tue Jul 12 09:29:33 2016, in response to Re: Waiting for proof, posted by TerrApin Station on Tue Jul 12 09:09:00 2016. I am RIGHT and you're wrong. On top of that you lose!! LOL!!Thank you for confirming you're not an expert. |
|
|
| (315981) | |
Re: Proof supplied but ignored |
|
|
Posted by Cornell Park on Tue Jul 12 10:21:46 2016, in response to Re: Proof supplied but ignored, posted by BrooklynBus on Mon Jul 11 19:12:27 2016. Well you answered enough to promote yourself. What about the part of what others reply to my posts, that I can't control? I don't like being accused of doing something because of a reply, and i take into consideration maybe my post was clear to me but not others. |
|
|
| (315983) | |
Re: Waiting for proof |
|
|
Posted by terRAPIN station on Tue Jul 12 13:13:30 2016, in response to Re: Waiting for proof, posted by nostalgia on Tue Jul 12 09:29:33 2016. Nope. And I did no such thing. |
|
|
| (315987) | |
Re: Proof supplied but ignored |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Tue Jul 12 16:19:45 2016, in response to Re: Proof supplied but ignored, posted by TerrApin Station on Mon Jul 11 08:01:13 2016. You must not have COMPLETELY understood what I said.I said "Fuckit". Meaning regardless of what his booclub hecklers "whine" about,he should keep on doing whatever he wants that contributed to the board,AND Then some. Some people have to be more guarded than others,thus hamstringing themselves with artificially induced decorum. Again,I say FUCKIT! Say what needs to be said,get it over with. Fuck outta here...even when hes right,you bitchasses would Still say he was wrong just to bitch about Something. You people are as dishonest as dishonest can be. |
|
|
| (315988) | |
Re: Proof supplied but ignored |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Tue Jul 12 16:21:01 2016, in response to Re: Proof supplied but ignored, posted by TerrApin Station on Mon Jul 11 08:01:13 2016. You must not have COMPLETELY understood what I said.I said "Fuckit". Meaning regardless of what his booclub hecklers "whine" about,he should keep on doing whatever he wants that contributed to the board,AND Then some. Some people have to be more guarded than others,thus hamstringing themselves with artificially induced decorum. Again,I say FUCKIT! Say what needs to be said,get it over with. Fuck outta here...even when hes right,you bitchasses would Still say he was wrong just to bitch about Something. You people are as dishonest as dishonest can be. |
|
|
| (315994) | |
Re: Waiting for proof |
|
|
Posted by nostalgia on Tue Jul 12 21:27:35 2016, in response to Re: Waiting for proof, posted by terRAPIN station on Tue Jul 12 13:13:30 2016. Sure you did! |
|
|
| (315995) | |
Re: Waiting for proof |
|
|
Posted by TerrApin Station on Tue Jul 12 21:44:05 2016, in response to Re: Waiting for proof, posted by nostalgia on Tue Jul 12 21:27:35 2016. Nope. Only in your mind. LOL! |
|
|
| (315996) | |
Re: Waiting for proof |
|
|
Posted by nostalgia on Tue Jul 12 21:45:34 2016, in response to Re: Waiting for proof, posted by TerrApin Station on Tue Jul 12 21:44:05 2016. Not just my mind. You advertised it to the ENTIRE list. LOL!!!Self-inflicted wound. |
|
|
| (315998) | |
Re: Proof supplied but ignored |
|
|
Posted by nostalgia on Tue Jul 12 22:20:20 2016, in response to Re: Proof supplied but ignored, posted by Edwards! on Tue Jul 12 16:19:45 2016. OWNED! |
|
|
| (315999) | |
Re: Waiting for proof |
|
|
Posted by TerrApin Station on Tue Jul 12 22:48:58 2016, in response to Re: Waiting for proof, posted by nostalgia on Tue Jul 12 21:45:34 2016. Nope. Only in your mind. LOL!!! |
|
|
| (316000) | |
Re: Proof supplied but ignored |
|
|
Posted by TerrApin Station on Tue Jul 12 22:50:31 2016, in response to Re: Proof supplied but ignored, posted by Edwards! on Tue Jul 12 16:19:45 2016. What are you talking about? I responded directly to your post. Are you on drugs or just a moron?? |
|
|
| (316001) | |
Re: Proof supplied but ignored |
|
|
Posted by TerrApin Station on Tue Jul 12 22:51:25 2016, in response to Re: Proof supplied but ignored, posted by Edwards! on Tue Jul 12 16:21:01 2016. Nope. I just told you that's not the case. Am I talking to a wall??? LOL!! |
|
|
| (316004) | |
Re: Proof supplied but ignored |
|
|
Posted by nostalgia on Tue Jul 12 23:23:50 2016, in response to Re: Proof supplied but ignored, posted by TerrApin Station on Tue Jul 12 22:51:25 2016. WRONG. Edwards is talking to a wall. LOL!! |
|
|
| (316005) | |
Re: Waiting for proof |
|
|
Posted by nostalgia on Tue Jul 12 23:25:37 2016, in response to Re: Waiting for proof, posted by TerrApin Station on Tue Jul 12 22:48:58 2016. WRONG. The ENTIRE list. You're just trying to cover up your faux pas. |
|
|
| (316008) | |
Re: Proof supplied but ignored |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Jul 13 00:31:53 2016, in response to Re: Proof supplied but ignored, posted by nostalgia on Tue Jul 12 23:23:50 2016. Wrong. I'm talking to two walls. |
|
|
| (316009) | |
Re: Waiting for proof |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Jul 13 00:32:24 2016, in response to Re: Waiting for proof, posted by nostalgia on Tue Jul 12 23:25:37 2016. Nope. Not at all. You're just covering for a lack of brain cells. |
|
|
| (316012) | |
Re: Proof supplied but ignored |
|
|
Posted by nostalgia on Wed Jul 13 09:23:43 2016, in response to Re: Proof supplied but ignored, posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Jul 13 00:31:53 2016. WRONG. I'm talking to concrete. Extra thick and extra dense. |
|
|
| (316013) | |
Re: Waiting for proof |
|
|
Posted by nostalgia on Wed Jul 13 09:25:52 2016, in response to Re: Waiting for proof, posted by Terrapin Station on Wed Jul 13 00:32:24 2016. You can afford to write about lack of brain cells. You just complain and don't offer any original ideas It takes a craftsman to build a house but only a idiot (that's you) to tear it down. |
|
|
| (316014) | |
Re: Proof supplied but ignored |
|
|
Posted by terRAPIN station on Wed Jul 13 09:27:40 2016, in response to Re: Proof supplied but ignored, posted by nostalgia on Wed Jul 13 09:23:43 2016. Nope. |
|
|
| (316015) | |
Re: Waiting for proof |
|
|
Posted by terRAPIN station on Wed Jul 13 09:28:27 2016, in response to Re: Waiting for proof, posted by nostalgia on Wed Jul 13 09:25:52 2016. This isn't about me. Don't try to change the subject to deflect, LOL! This is about you and BrooklynBus being complete morons! |
|
|
| (316018) | |
Re: Waiting for proof |
|
|
Posted by nostalgia on Wed Jul 13 09:53:06 2016, in response to Re: Waiting for proof, posted by terRAPIN station on Wed Jul 13 09:28:27 2016. YOU are the subject! You should be happy to get so much attention because of your inferiority complex and attention deficit disorder.You write like there's a tidal wave of complaints against Bus. But since only the usual suspects complain, it's very difficult to take them seriously. Edwards was RIGHT about you -- and so am I. |
|
|
| (316019) | |
Re: Proof supplied but ignored |
|
|
Posted by nostalgia on Wed Jul 13 09:54:01 2016, in response to Re: Proof supplied but ignored, posted by terRAPIN station on Wed Jul 13 09:27:40 2016. Yep. I'm RIGHT again and you LOSE AGAIN! LOL!! |
|
|
| (316020) | |
Re: Waiting for proof |
|
|
Posted by nostalgia on Wed Jul 13 09:54:39 2016, in response to Re: Waiting for proof, posted by TerrApin Station on Tue Jul 12 22:48:58 2016. At least I have a mind. I don't know what's sitting on top of your shoulders. |
|
|
| (316021) | |
Re: Waiting for proof |
|
|
Posted by BrooklynBus on Wed Jul 13 10:22:38 2016, in response to Re: Waiting for proof, posted by nostalgia on Wed Jul 13 09:54:39 2016. Why do you even bother?I ask myself the same question sometimes. |
|
|
| (316022) | |
Re: Waiting for proof |
|
|
Posted by BrooklynBus on Wed Jul 13 10:23:37 2016, in response to Re: Waiting for proof, posted by terRAPIN station on Wed Jul 13 09:28:27 2016. This I coming from the person who insists HE DOESN'T ATTACK.Just proves what a LIAR you are. |
|
|
| (316023) | |
Re: Waiting for proof |
|
|
Posted by BrooklynBus on Wed Jul 13 10:24:47 2016, in response to Re: Waiting for proof, posted by nostalgia on Wed Jul 13 09:25:52 2016. But an idiot might hurt himself and others tearing it down, so I wou,don't give him that much credit by calling him an idiot. |
|
|
| (316025) | |
Re: Waiting for proof |
|
|
Posted by nostalgia on Wed Jul 13 11:57:40 2016, in response to Re: Waiting for proof, posted by BrooklynBus on Wed Jul 13 10:24:47 2016. Point well taken.I left you a PM on NYCTF, |
|
|
| (316028) | |
Re: Waiting for proof |
|
|
Posted by nostalgia on Wed Jul 13 13:52:40 2016, in response to Re: Waiting for proof, posted by BrooklynBus on Wed Jul 13 10:22:38 2016. Some people, e.g. football players, donate their brains to science.Whiny WHinberg has nothing to offer. LOL!! |
|
|
| (316031) | |
Re: Waiting for proof |
|
|
Posted by terRAPIN station on Wed Jul 13 14:25:52 2016, in response to Re: Waiting for proof, posted by BrooklynBus on Wed Jul 13 10:23:37 2016. Correct. I don't attack. I deal with reality.mo·ron |
|
|
| (316033) | |
Re: Waiting for proof |
|
|
Posted by nostalgia on Wed Jul 13 15:14:51 2016, in response to Re: Waiting for proof, posted by terRAPIN station on Wed Jul 13 14:25:52 2016. Bus doesn't agree you don't attack. He called you a LIAR when you write you don't attack.English comprehension must be challenging for you. |
|
|
| (316046) | |
Re: Proof supplied but ignored |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Wed Jul 13 22:22:54 2016, in response to Re: Proof supplied but ignored, posted by TerrApin Station on Mon Jul 11 19:33:25 2016. WTF is this...Romper Room?Why dont You save everyone the trouble,and just leave...or stay...what fuckin ever! Personally,Id rather you stay,just so you can continue to be my favorite verbal 👊 bag. Since we all know you aint hoin nowhere,cut the dumb bullshit out. Damned asshole. |
|
|
| (316051) | |
Re: Proof supplied but ignored |
|
|
Posted by TerrApin Station on Wed Jul 13 22:56:56 2016, in response to Re: Proof supplied but ignored, posted by Edwards! on Wed Jul 13 22:22:54 2016. Are you retarded, or just stupid? Really. |
|
|
| (316052) | |
Re: Proof supplied but ignored |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Wed Jul 13 23:42:31 2016, in response to Re: Proof supplied but ignored, posted by TerrApin Station on Wed Jul 13 22:56:56 2016. Compared to you?Everyone here is a fucking intellectual dynamo. Everyone. |
|
|
| (316053) | |
Re: Proof supplied but ignored |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Wed Jul 13 23:48:38 2016, in response to Re: Proof supplied but ignored, posted by nostalgia on Mon Jul 11 10:09:55 2016. Truth! |
|
|
| (316054) | |
Re: Waiting for proof |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Wed Jul 13 23:55:27 2016, in response to Re: Waiting for proof, posted by terRAPIN station on Wed Jul 13 09:28:27 2016. LOL...Not only are you dishonest...but you are a,bitchass nigga,too!😃 |
|
|
| (316055) | |
Re: Waiting for proof |
|
|
Posted by Edwards! on Wed Jul 13 23:58:00 2016, in response to Re: Waiting for proof, posted by nostalgia on Wed Jul 13 09:54:39 2016. 😕Empty space,dude...empty space full of hot air. Guess thats why hes such a freakin windbag. |
|
|
|
Page 23 of 24 |
||