S20 Montauk Highway/Oak Street Loop Effective 2/22/16 (310243) | |
Home > BusChat |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
(310249) | |
Re: S20 Montauk Highway/Oak Street Loop Effective 2/22/16 |
|
Posted by caine515 on Fri Feb 5 14:39:38 2016, in response to S20 Montauk Highway/Oak Street Loop Effective 2/22/16, posted by checkmatechamp13 on Fri Feb 5 00:38:24 2016. The head ways are longer but at least no more lunchtime gap in the middle. |
|
(310250) | |
Re: S20 Montauk Highway/Oak Street Loop Effective 2/22/16 |
|
Posted by Mac5689 on Fri Feb 5 20:23:57 2016, in response to S20 Montauk Highway/Oak Street Loop Effective 2/22/16, posted by checkmatechamp13 on Fri Feb 5 00:38:24 2016. The Current S20 only has one bus. Or at least that's what I thought. |
|
(310251) | |
Re: S20 Montauk Highway/Oak Street Loop Effective 2/22/16 |
|
Posted by checkmatechamp13 on Fri Feb 5 21:20:45 2016, in response to Re: S20 Montauk Highway/Oak Street Loop Effective 2/22/16, posted by Mac5689 on Fri Feb 5 20:23:57 2016. My mistake. Yeah, the new proposal uses an extra bus (which should theoretically allow for each loop to run every hour instead of every 90 minutes). They added too much runtime to the schedule IMO. |
|
(310254) | |
Re: S20 Montauk Highway/Oak Street Loop Effective 2/22/16 |
|
Posted by Joe V on Sat Feb 6 09:37:59 2016, in response to S20 Montauk Highway/Oak Street Loop Effective 2/22/16, posted by checkmatechamp13 on Fri Feb 5 00:38:24 2016. Was this done because they killed the Suffolk portion of the N19 ? |
|
(310256) | |
Re: S20 Montauk Highway/Oak Street Loop Effective 2/22/16 |
|
Posted by Mac5689 on Sat Feb 6 12:19:18 2016, in response to Re: S20 Montauk Highway/Oak Street Loop Effective 2/22/16, posted by Joe V on Sat Feb 6 09:37:59 2016. I would assume so, Suffolk probably saw an opportunity to bring in more fares from those who were left behind by the cuts to the n19.There has been no official word however, that I know of at least, for why this move has been done. |
|