|
|
| More bureaucratic hurdles for Fung Wah (305500) | |
 |
|
| Home > BusChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
| (305500) | |
More bureaucratic hurdles for Fung Wah |
|
|
Posted by jasonbellamy on Tue May 26 12:41:52 2015 Ah, the old "You have to use the bus terminal, but sorry, the bus terminal is full" line.http://www.bostonglobe.com/business/2015/05/25/lack-local-stop-may-shut-down-fung-wah/u8uYk7XlpAWbKqGPaEB8qK/story.html |
|
|
| (305503) | |
Re: More bureaucratic hurdles for Fung Wah |
|
|
Posted by JAzumah on Tue May 26 16:07:49 2015, in response to More bureaucratic hurdles for Fung Wah, posted by jasonbellamy on Tue May 26 12:41:52 2015. Either Fung Wah grows a pair or they shut down. |
|
|
| (305519) | |
Re: More bureaucratic hurdles for Fung Wah |
|
|
Posted by jasonbellamy on Tue May 26 18:27:53 2015, in response to Re: More bureaucratic hurdles for Fung Wah, posted by JAzumah on Tue May 26 16:07:49 2015. Has anyone successfully fought a local restriction on curbside pickups? |
|
|
| (305549) | |
Re: More bureaucratic hurdles for Fung Wah |
|
|
Posted by JAzumah on Wed May 27 12:15:50 2015, in response to Re: More bureaucratic hurdles for Fung Wah, posted by jasonbellamy on Tue May 26 18:27:53 2015. No, because people are scared it will bankrupt them...and they should be. However, it is illegal to prevent new intercity bus service from operating to Boston. It is also illegal to force buses to pickup areas that would have almost the same effect as not letting them operate at all.Fung Wah has the money to fight, but they choose not to. |
|
|