|
|
| Yeah I know we've talked about it to death, but. . . (303845) | |
 |
|
| Home > BusChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
| (303845) | |
Yeah I know we've talked about it to death, but. . . |
|
|
Posted by New Flyer #857 on Wed Mar 25 08:47:59 2015 . . .I didn't see it posted here yet.200 million dollars, 14 miles. |
|
|
| (303851) | |
Re: Yeah I know we've talked about it to death, but. . . |
|
|
Posted by terRAPIN station on Wed Mar 25 08:58:16 2015, in response to Yeah I know we've talked about it to death, but. . ., posted by New Flyer #857 on Wed Mar 25 08:47:59 2015. haha, BrooklynBus is gonna be PEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE-YISSSSSSSSSSSSSSSED! |
|
|
| (303853) | |
Re: Yeah I know we've talked about it to death, but. . . |
|
|
Posted by r33/r36 mainline on Wed Mar 25 12:11:23 2015, in response to Yeah I know we've talked about it to death, but. . ., posted by New Flyer #857 on Wed Mar 25 08:47:59 2015. Boooo, I wanted to see the rail line restored. I guess the Orange M to Rock Park is a pipe dream now.. |
|
|
| (303854) | |
Re: Yeah I know we've talked about it to death, but. . . |
|
|
Posted by New Flyer #857 on Wed Mar 25 12:43:30 2015, in response to Re: Yeah I know we've talked about it to death, but. . ., posted by r33/r36 mainline on Wed Mar 25 12:11:23 2015. Well it's not unheard of to have subway corridors parallel BRT/SBS (e.g. Nostrand Ave, and maybe-soon-to-be Second Ave), though the purpose of BRT/SBS in my opinion is to go where the subway doesn't, i.e. Cross-Brooklyn, Eastern Queens, etc. Woodhaven Blvd fits that criterion in terms of location (the subway doesn't go north-south in Queens) but yeah it means leaving-abandoned the parallel rail line. |
|
|
| (303857) | |
Re: Yeah I know we've talked about it to death, but. . . |
|
|
Posted by R 36 ML 9542 on Wed Mar 25 17:02:47 2015, in response to Re: Yeah I know we've talked about it to death, but. . ., posted by New Flyer #857 on Wed Mar 25 12:43:30 2015. Smh. Scrap this SBS nonsense on Woodhaven blvd. It won't work. |
|
|