S53 (267023) | |
Home > BusChat |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
(267024) | |
Re: S53 |
|
Posted by LRG5784 on Thu Sep 20 14:17:55 2012, in response to S53, posted by (SIR) North Shore line on Thu Sep 20 14:03:45 2012. Have you tried mailing the MTA about your inquiry? |
|
(267025) | |
Re: S53 |
|
Posted by RailBus63 on Thu Sep 20 14:48:05 2012, in response to S53, posted by (SIR) North Shore line on Thu Sep 20 14:03:45 2012. Isn't that what the S93 is? |
|
(267027) | |
Re: S53 |
|
Posted by LRG5784 on Thu Sep 20 14:56:59 2012, in response to Re: S53, posted by RailBus63 on Thu Sep 20 14:48:05 2012. The S53 and S93 Limited are two different routes. It's more like an isotope of the S53, but it has a different destination. Passengers can get a quick ride from Brooklyn to Victory/Clove on the S93, but would have to transfer to the S53 at that stop. |
|
(267036) | |
Re: S53 |
|
Posted by B49 Limited on Thu Sep 20 20:15:34 2012, in response to Re: S53, posted by LRG5784 on Thu Sep 20 14:56:59 2012. That is the best way to describe the S53. The S 93 in many ways is Staten Islands B 103 a super limited but it branches to serve a Col of SI |
|
(267039) | |
Re: S53 |
|
Posted by checkmatechamp13 on Thu Sep 20 21:11:42 2012, in response to Re: S53, posted by LRG5784 on Thu Sep 20 14:56:59 2012. Actually Howard Avenue would be an easier transfer (going westbound), since you don't have to cross the street. |
|
(267040) | |
Re: S53 |
|
Posted by LRG5784 on Thu Sep 20 21:15:53 2012, in response to Re: S53, posted by checkmatechamp13 on Thu Sep 20 21:11:42 2012. That's true. |
|
(267050) | |
Re: S53 |
|
Posted by Flxible Metro on Fri Sep 21 00:21:56 2012, in response to S53, posted by (SIR) North Shore line on Thu Sep 20 14:03:45 2012. I have not been in NYC for nearly 8 years and even then,the S53 was very overcrowded ! |
|