Home · Maps · About

Home > BusChat

[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]

(260314)

view threaded

NJ Transit to cut five bus routes

Posted by Gold_12TH on Tue May 15 13:10:06 2012

edf40wrjww2msgDetailB:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Five underperforming NJ Transit bus routes are on the chopping block in a move intended to save $3.09 million, $2 million of which will be plowed back into keeping fares stable for the coming year.

NJ Transit officials on Monday announced the cuts as a result of the Bus System Optimization review, an 18-month study of the agency’s 260 routes.

The study compared similar bus routes to find overlapping service in an effort to fix underperforming lines, reduce costs and increase ridership while not leaving riders without options, NJT officials said.

“It’s a place to get the most savings while affecting the fewest people,” said Alan Maiman, deputy general manager of bus service planning, who said this is the first major discontinuation of NJ Transit-run bus service since the late 1980s.

The process, which Maiman said was driven by the agency’s Scorecard initiative to use resources more efficiently, compares like bus routes, such as those in Monmouth and Ocean counties, with similar suburban services.
Three factors

The process focused on three major factors: the number of customers riding per hour, the amount of money from fares versus the operating cost, and subsidy per customer versus the operating cost, Maiman said.

Twenty-seven bus routes were identified for further review, and that list was narrowed to 11 identified for adjustments. Five of those were recommended to be discontinued, he said.

Of the agency’s 520,000 daily bus riders, the changes would affect 3,000 riders, and of those, 93 would be left with no options, such as using another bus route.

Routes to be discontinued are: No. 42 Newark-18th Avenue; No. 43, Newark-Jersey City; No. 75 Butler-Newark; No. 78 Newark-Secaucus; and No. 93 Bloomfield-Newark Light Rail.

Changes will be made to the No. 451 Camden/Lindenwold PATCO route to eliminate service between Voorhees Town Center and the Lindenwold PATCO station.

Maiman said that in addition to two other bus routes serving those destinations, the PATCO rail line also parallels the 451. Cuts to other routes include reducing weekend or Sunday service or cutting services on parts of the route that had few riders.

That route needed the highest state subsidy, $8.63 per rider, in addition to the $1.50 fare. NJ Transit generally aims for fares to pay for 61 percent of the operating costs.

The initiative will not result in laying off workers, because those positions can be absorbed by attrition or closing of bus garages.

Two public hearings are scheduled from 1 to 2 p.m. and 5 to 8 p.m. on June 12 at NJ Transit headquarters, 1 Penn Plaza East, Newark. Comments also will be taken on line at www.njtransit.com.
---http://www.app.com/article/20120514/NJNEWS/305140073/NJ-Transit-cut-five-bus-routes

BUS SERVICE OPTIMIZATION INITIATIVE TO DRIVE NEW INVESTMENT, GREATER EFFICIENCIES

Innovative plan supports taxpayers, matches service demand; Public hearings scheduled for June

May 14, 2012
NJT-12-031

NEWARK, NJ — Reaffirming NJ TRANSIT’s commitment to customers and the hard-working taxpayers of the State of New Jersey, NJ TRANSIT Executive Director James Weinstein today unveiled an innovative plan designed to optimize NJ TRANSIT bus operations for sustained, long-term growth, while also reinvesting critical resources to expand and enhance bus service within key transportation corridors.

“The innovative Bus Service Optimization proposal announced today fulfills the call for government to provide smarter, more efficient services at less cost to customers and the taxpayers,” said NJ TRANSIT Executive Director James Weinstein. “A measurable result of NJ TRANSIT’s successful Scorecard initiative, Bus Service Optimization will ensure that NJ TRANSIT uses its limited resources to provide the best service to the most customers—all while holding the line on fares.”

NJ TRANSIT’s proposed Bus Service Optimization initiative resulted from extensive examination of each of NJ TRANSIT’s existing bus routes. As part of this process, the bus routes were broken down into seventeen groupings or geographic markets and reviewed using twenty separate metrics, including customers per hour, fare box recovery and subsidy per customer. The proposed initiative will go before the public in June, when two public hearings will be held in Newark and Wayne to solicit public input.

“NJ TRANSIT’s leaders in bus operations, finance, planning, research and civil rights utilized specific, clear metrics while also focusing on customer impacts, economic impact, available travel alternatives and the overall impact on the community,” said Weinstein. “The end result is an innovative service plan that provides the greatest return to our customers and to New Jersey’s taxpayers.”

As a result of extensive study and analysis, NJ TRANSIT’s Bus Service Optimization initiative forecasts more than $3 million in annual operation savings. These savings will be reflected in the upcoming Fiscal Year 2013 budget and will be utilized to help keep fares stable for the nearly 250 million customers who utilize NJ TRANSIT services on an annual basis.

Of this savings, NJ TRANSIT will be immediately reinvesting more than $1.02 million to expand and enhance bus service within the City of Newark, in addition to key corridors between Newark, Newark Airport and Elizabeth.

“Not only will our Bus Service Optimization keep fares stable for NJ TRANSIT customers, but a portion of the optimization savings will be reinvested back into additional service within the Newark corridor, as well as between Newark, Newark Airport and Elizabeth,” said Weinstein. “This reinvestment of Bus Service Optimization savings will ultimately enhance the customer experience for those traveling in this critical transportation corridor.”

This reinvestment of savings will be reflected in:

The restructuring of Route No. 62 (Newark-Woodbridge-Perth Amboy) into two separate routes, allowing for the creation of 24/7 service between the heavily-travelled Newark-Newark Airport and Elizabeth Corridor. Optimization reinvestment will increase bus service reliability, balance resources and help spur job access at the airport.
The extension of Route No. 99 (Newark-Hillside Cross-town) to the Branch Brook Park Newark Light Rail Station. Reinvestment will provide Newark residents and employees with connections to more than a dozen routes and access to the light rail system. It will also improve service to major medical facilities, schools and universities.

Eleven bus routes were reviewed for adjustment following this comprehensive process. These routes are either largely underutilized, or directly compete with NJ TRANSIT rail or light rail services. These routes average 16 customers per trip, in comparison to the system wide average of 35.

The routes include:

No. 42 (Newark-18th Avenue): Discontinue service
No. 43 (Newark-Jersey City): Discontinue service
No. 56 (Elizabeth/Cranford/Winfield): Widen peak hour headway from 25/40 minutes to 60 minutes
No. 57 (Elizabeth/Linden): Eliminate first/last round trips on weekdays
No. 75 (Butler-Newark): Discontinue service
No. 78 (Newark-Secaucus): Discontinue service
No. 93 (Bloomfield-Newark Light Rail): Discontinue service
No. 181 (Union City-NY/GWB): Discontinue Sunday service
No. 258 (Bloomfield/Newark Airport): Eliminate University Heights Branch, adjust headway to 30 minutes all day
No. 451 (Camden/Lindenwold PATCO): Eliminate service between Voorhees Town Center and Lindenwold PATCO
No. 604 (Trenton/East Trenton): Eliminate some peak-hour service between Trenton Transit Center and Justice Complex

For these 11 separate routes, most customers will not be significantly impacted, as system access remains available with reasonable alternatives. In some cases, customers may need to walk a reasonable distance to access service, or be subject to a two-seat ride instead of a one-seat ride.



NJ TRANSIT invites members of the public to offer their feedback on the Bus Service Optimization initiative. Interested parties are invited to visit njtransit.com, contact the Customer Service hotline at (973) 275-5555, or attend one of the following two public hearings to offer their feedback in person:



Tuesday, June 12, 2012
11 a.m. – 2 p.m. (Public Information Session)
5 p.m. – 8 p.m.
NJ TRANSIT Headquarters, One Penn Plaza East, Newark

Wednesday, June 13, 2012
5 p.m. – 8 p.m.
Wayne Municipal Complex, 475 Valley Road, Wayne



About NJ TRANSIT

NJ TRANSIT is the nation's largest statewide public transportation system providing more than 895,000 weekday trips on 260 bus routes, three light rail lines, 12 commuter rail lines and through Access Link paratransit service. It is the third largest transit system in the country with 164 rail stations, 60 light rail stations and more than 19,000 bus stops linking major points in New Jersey, New York and Philadelphia.

---http://www.njtransit.com/tm/tm_servlet.srv?hdnPageAction=PressReleaseTo&PRESS_RELEASE_ID=2760

Post a New Response

(260329)

view threaded

Re: NJ Transit to cut five bus routes

Posted by BusMgr on Tue May 15 15:41:33 2012, in response to NJ Transit to cut five bus routes, posted by Gold_12TH on Tue May 15 13:10:06 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailB:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Once again, a transit agency states, “It’s a place to get the most savings while affecting the fewest people.” No, for taxpayer-funded public transportation, it is not merely an analysis of the number of people affected, but also how those people are affected.

Consider two alternatives (and assume each would have the same financial effect). First, 100 people are affected by a change on bus route 1, and all those affected are able to complete their travel by traveling on bus route 2. Second, 5 people are affected by a change on bus route 3, but not a single person is capable of competing their travel with any other possible alternative. Using NJT's analysis, the second change ought to be made, because it affects fewer people, even though it affects those people significantly. But, public policy supports the first change, because even though more people are affected, the degree to which they are affected is insignificant.

Simplistic soundbite answers are not always the proper response.

Post a New Response

(260336)

view threaded

Re: NJ Transit to cut five bus routes

Posted by RailBus63 on Tue May 15 17:04:55 2012, in response to Re: NJ Transit to cut five bus routes, posted by BusMgr on Tue May 15 15:41:33 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailB:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
The problem is, 100 people will usually make a lot more noise than the 5 people.

Post a New Response

(260392)

view threaded

Re: NJ Transit to cut five bus routes

Posted by North-Easten T/O on Wed May 16 06:57:10 2012, in response to NJ Transit to cut five bus routes, posted by Gold_12TH on Tue May 15 13:10:06 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailB:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
I can tell you one line that need MORE buses is the 139. Its becouming standing room only on some of the Mid Morning buses during the week. Then the gap of 1 hour from 12mid to 1am were there not but to Lakewood. There a 1230am bus out of the Port but it ends short at Alder Dr. Park and Ride. I need to go 2 more stop but if I miss the 12mid bus I have to wait a hour, and yes I have missed the 12mid bus a few time and waited. There was a few people who have to do this as well. Its not fair send the 1230am bus the extra 12mins into Lakewood would save maybe 15 people from waiting an extra 30mins to get home.

Post a New Response

(260450)

view threaded

Re: NJ Transit to cut five bus routes

Posted by Flxible4life on Thu May 17 15:27:43 2012, in response to Re: NJ Transit to cut five bus routes, posted by North-Easten T/O on Wed May 16 06:57:10 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailB:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
That line is major in Central Jersey! I know they have talks and plans for a central rail line, but that's going to take years. I agree with the gentleman that missed his 12a.m. Bus to Lakewood. NJ Transit should extend all trips past mid-night to Lakewood. During rush hour, the line has 50 plus buses running along rte.9 corridor and not to mentioned it's helper..Academy with who knows how many buses. Until they start putting the rails down for central jersey to Newark/NYC, please add more bus service mid-mornings and throughout the day NJT. Not to mention the weekends.

Post a New Response

(260500)

view threaded

Re: NJ Transit to cut five bus routes

Posted by kknj on Fri May 18 22:15:16 2012, in response to NJ Transit to cut five bus routes, posted by Gold_12TH on Tue May 15 13:10:06 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailB:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Why don't they cut the #82 line in Hudson County? That route runs only 6 round trips a day, and it totally duplicates other routes. Along Summit Avenue it runs along with the #83. And between Five Corners and Exchange Place it's the #80.

Post a New Response

(260522)

view threaded

Re: NJ Transit to cut five bus routes

Posted by SJP7121 on Sat May 19 10:11:08 2012, in response to Re: NJ Transit to cut five bus routes, posted by kknj on Fri May 18 22:15:16 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailB:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Because that line is mostly for the financial and school people. I've driven it and it carries, especially the school kids. Standing room, to the standee line type of people.

Post a New Response

(260528)

view threaded

Re: NJ Transit to cut five bus routes

Posted by Gotham Bus Co. on Sat May 19 11:17:10 2012, in response to Re: NJ Transit to cut five bus routes, posted by BusMgr on Tue May 15 15:41:33 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailB:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
To what degree must everybody else subsidize those 5 passengers? Do they really warrant a full-size bus on a regular everyday schedule "just in case" they feel like going somewhere once? Maybe it would be better to give them taxi vouchers for when they actually need to travel.

Post a New Response

(260531)

view threaded

Re: NJ Transit to cut five bus routes

Posted by BusMgr on Sat May 19 12:19:11 2012, in response to Re: NJ Transit to cut five bus routes, posted by Gotham Bus Co. on Sat May 19 11:17:10 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailB:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
If 100 people are "affected," but the only result of having been affected is that they must instead use a different bus route, and we assume, arguendo, that each "affected" person has their journey extended by 1 minute (maybe increased dwell time from additional passengers), then the effect can be quantified as 100 person-minutes. On the other hand, if 5 people are "affected" by a different service change, and if we assume here, arguendo, that the result is that each person has no alternative service and must instead walk for 60 minutes to reach their destination, then the effect can be quantified as 300 person-minutes. The second scenario is more severe, and if only one service can be maintained financially, the second scenario is probably more deserving.

Yes, on a per-capita basis the 5 people in the second scenario get more. But so what? If we're subsidizing transportation on the basis of the service, and not the passengers, then we need to look at the effects of system of services. People who travel for longer distances, or on less traveled routes, receive a greater subsidy benefit.

That being said, there is something to the concept of providing every public transit user with a fixed dollar subsidy (which could be freely alienated to the extent not used), and then have all transit priced at a free market unsubsidized rate. For the "average" user, there would be no change. For the user who patronizes more expensive services (e.g., longer distance, less-traveled routes) out-of-pocket costs would be higher; and for those who patronize less expensive route the reverse would be true. If such a scheme were established throughout the NJT service area, I would expect that people who live in Newark or Hudson County would see a substantial benefit to themselves, whereas those people who live in places like southern New Jersey and Warren County would see monumental increases in their costs.

Post a New Response

(261372)

view threaded

Re: NJ Transit to cut five bus routes

Posted by Olog-hai on Thu May 31 21:15:19 2012, in response to Re: NJ Transit to cut five bus routes, posted by SJP7121 on Sat May 19 10:11:08 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailB:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Still duplicates other routes.

Post a New Response

(261373)

view threaded

Re: NJ Transit to cut five bus routes

Posted by Olog-hai on Thu May 31 21:17:15 2012, in response to NJ Transit to cut five bus routes, posted by Gold_12TH on Tue May 15 13:10:06 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailB:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
I wonder what kind of "restructuring" they're planning to do with the 62. It's always operated as two routes de-facto, south of Rahway. There should have been a bus route running "short" between Newark and Elizabeth via the airport ages ago, too.

Post a New Response

(261383)

view threaded

Re: NJ Transit to cut five bus routes

Posted by SJP7121 on Thu May 31 22:58:58 2012, in response to Re: NJ Transit to cut five bus routes, posted by Olog-hai on Thu May 31 21:15:19 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailB:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
Ok, so what do you propose?

Post a New Response

(261384)

view threaded

Re: NJ Transit to cut five bus routes

Posted by SJP7121 on Thu May 31 23:01:38 2012, in response to NJ Transit to cut five bus routes, posted by Gold_12TH on Tue May 15 13:10:06 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailB:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
"The initiative will not result in laying off workers, because those positions can be absorbed by attrition or closing of bus garages." Are they NUTS? If ONE Garage closes, where the hell those drivers going to work? Where are the buses going to be parked? What garage will do what lines? It might cost the company MORE since there is Deadhead time, which drivers do get paid for. So, you close a garage, but pay more deadhead time for a driver to get to point A. I don't get the logic in that.

Post a New Response

(261392)

view threaded

Re: NJ Transit to cut five bus routes

Posted by Henry R32 #3730 on Thu May 31 23:42:39 2012, in response to Re: NJ Transit to cut five bus routes, posted by BusMgr on Sat May 19 12:19:11 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailB:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
On the other hand, if 5 people are "affected" by a different service change, and if we assume here, arguendo, that the result is that each person has no alternative service and must instead walk for 60 minutes to reach their destination, then the effect can be quantified as 300 person-minutes.

There's a flip side here though... sometimes reducing the bus schedule on a popular route results in people who want to take a scheduled bus (and arrive on time for it) being shut out of a bus that has gotten too crowded. Such a situation is absolutely unacceptable regardless of the time difference because the bus system's reliability has been compromised.

Also in Albany there was a similar argument about our route restructuring. Many runs of several routes had patronages of less than 5 for the unique portion of their route. Meanwhile, there were higher density destination pairs that had no direct service, and one entire neighborhood that had no bus at all. By axing the lines that regularly patronage on the level of a car pool, we got brand new routes that have 15-20 people per bus over the unique portion of their routes. These people save time by either not having to walk for 10 minutes for their bus or not having to wait 20 minutes for a transfer. It doesn't matter if a bus commute is "possible" if it takes twice as long as driving; it becomes equally as useless to most residents as if there was no bus at all.

The bottom line is you have to do the most good with the resources you have.

Post a New Response

(261393)

view threaded

Re: NJ Transit to cut five bus routes

Posted by Olog-hai on Thu May 31 23:50:44 2012, in response to Re: NJ Transit to cut five bus routes, posted by SJP7121 on Thu May 31 22:58:58 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailB:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
What's to propose? If you have a monthly pass, you can transfer from 80 to 83 and vice-versa; or buy a transfer. The streets are covered.

Post a New Response


[ Return to the Message Index ]