|
|
| Re: NJT 351 to be cut back to Secaucus Junction (111902) | |
 |
|
| Home > BusChat | |
[ Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
|
Page 4 of 4 |
||
|
| (112261) | |
Re: NJT 351 to be cut back to Secaucus Junction |
|
|
Posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Aug 21 08:26:59 2008, in response to Re: NJT 351 to be cut back to Secaucus Junction, posted by Kew Gardens Teleport on Thu Aug 21 08:07:47 2008. no, it was posted that modifications (to the suspension?) where made to the buses to presumably lower them, either permanently or for just when going through the tunnel. |
|
|
| (112262) | |
Re: NJT 351 to be cut back to Secaucus Junction |
|
|
Posted by AMoreira81 on Thu Aug 21 08:37:36 2008, in response to Re: NJT 351 to be cut back to Secaucus Junction, posted by kcram3500 on Wed Aug 20 14:22:01 2008. Just one revision to the list: 450-499 is for southwest New Jersey intastate locals (the 468 fits into that class as the Salem County local). |
|
|
| (112264) | |
Re: NJT 351 to be cut back to Secaucus Junction |
|
|
Posted by AMoreira81 on Thu Aug 21 08:39:58 2008, in response to Re: NJT 351 to be cut back to Secaucus Junction, posted by JAzumah on Wed Aug 20 04:42:01 2008. However...with the 71xx MCIs and the upcoming NABIs, no federal money has or will be used. |
|
|
| (112267) | |
Re: NJT 351 to be cut back to Secaucus Junction |
|
|
Posted by kcram3500 on Thu Aug 21 08:49:22 2008, in response to Re: NJT 351 to be cut back to Secaucus Junction, posted by AMoreira81 on Thu Aug 21 08:37:36 2008. I did say scattered exceptions ;) |
|
|
| (112271) | |
Re: NJT 351 to be cut back to Secaucus Junction |
|
|
Posted by AMoreira81 on Thu Aug 21 10:13:21 2008, in response to Re: NJT 351 to be cut back to Secaucus Junction, posted by JAzumah on Wed Aug 20 23:47:24 2008. It might depend where, however. But as the casinos are PRIVATE enterprises...it is discretionary. |
|
|
| (112273) | |
Re: NJT 351 to be cut back to Secaucus Junction |
|
|
Posted by Hank Eisenstein on Thu Aug 21 10:22:53 2008, in response to Re: NJT 351 to be cut back to Secaucus Junction, posted by Terrapin Station on Thu Aug 21 08:26:59 2008. I missed the post that said this... |
|
|
| (112288) | |
Re: NJT 351 to be cut back to Secaucus Junction |
|
|
Posted by Hank Eisenstein on Thu Aug 21 13:32:07 2008, in response to Re: NJT 351 to be cut back to Secaucus Junction, posted by AMoreira81 on Thu Aug 21 08:39:58 2008. I will share my soda with you. I will take the bottom half, you will take the top half.To get to the bottom half, I had to drink your half, too. Sorry. Let me know if you can't figure out how my puzzle relates. |
|
|
| (112412) | |
Re: NJT 351 to be cut back to Secaucus Junction |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Fri Aug 22 13:56:24 2008, in response to Re: NJT 351 to be cut back to Secaucus Junction, posted by Transit Jeff on Tue Aug 19 23:36:08 2008. As more multi-level rail cars come in, the overcrowding and standing situation should easeUh, don't count on it. Secaucus Junction is grossly underutilized and should have more bus lines feeding it
|
|
|
| (112413) | |
Re: NJT 351 to be cut back to Secaucus Junction |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Fri Aug 22 13:57:11 2008, in response to Re: NJT 351 to be cut back to Secaucus Junction, posted by JohnnyMints on Wed Aug 20 00:36:21 2008. Having buses stop at SEC would. . . be a headache and slow down buses and trains. |
|
|
| (112414) | |
Re: NJT 351 to be cut back to Secaucus Junction |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Fri Aug 22 13:58:31 2008, in response to Re: NJT 351 to be cut back to Secaucus Junction, posted by Ken S. on Tue Aug 19 23:41:29 2008. That would be plumb useless. Run a train to AC via the Southern Division instead. |
|
|
| (112426) | |
Re: NJT 351 to be cut back to Secaucus Junction |
|
|
Posted by Hank Eisenstein on Fri Aug 22 15:19:29 2008, in response to Re: NJT 351 to be cut back to Secaucus Junction, posted by Transit Jeff on Tue Aug 19 23:36:08 2008. Biggest problem with this is most peak trains are already SRO at SEC. Where are the people going to go? |
|
|
| (112477) | |
Re: NJT 351 to be cut back to Secaucus Junction |
|
|
Posted by Olog-hai on Sat Aug 23 04:30:57 2008, in response to Re: NJT 351 to be cut back to Secaucus Junction, posted by Ken S. on Wed Aug 20 21:23:03 2008. if NJT decides to do so, ACES could stop at SEC and the casinos are paying for thatNo they aren't. NJT's been putting up the money. By the time the trains are running, they'll end up raising the fare to $100 one-way and nobody will ride. |
|
|
|
Page 4 of 4 |
||