|
|
| Re: Articles and letters from today’s Rockaway papers (337632) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > BusChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Articles and letters from today’s Rockaway papers |
|
|
Posted by Spider-Pig on Mon Jan 13 13:30:45 2020, in response to Re: Articles and letters from today’s Rockaway papers, posted by Catfish 44 on Mon Jan 13 13:23:48 2020. I don’t know the answer to that question. It sounds like a torturous trip regardless. If they take the 53 away it’ll add time and aggravation to her trip.Only because the Q53 is being eliminated completely and she will have to take three buses or two buses and the subway to replace it. Of course, while the Q53 to the Q60 is faster for her if she were aware of it, the Q53 to the 7 train is still faster and cutting back the Q53 eliminates that option. I disagree about "disabled." Being "disabled" doesn't just mean using a wheelchair. If you have trouble walking around relative to the typical person, that's a disability. However, you make a good point, because such a person isn't going to be eligible for paratransit, or reduced fare. |
|
|
|