|
|
| Re: Fighting the DOT S(BS) on Woodhaven Blvdn medians done (318208) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > BusChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Fighting the DOT S(BS) on Woodhaven Blvdn medians done |
|
|
Posted by R30A on Fri Sep 16 09:57:22 2016, in response to Re: Fighting the DOT S(BS) on Woodhaven Blvdn medians done, posted by BrooklynBus on Fri Sep 16 09:53:05 2016. "Letters written by idiots who cannot write and do not understand issues are not published."Obviously false. You repeatedly demonstrate that such is false. "But anyone can post (I should not have said publish) on blogs." Yes, but I see no connection to any point you are making about me. I generally don't post on blogs either. "No one other than you has stated that a plan can refer to existing conditions because it is not true." That is blatantly false. A. It certainly can. B. Many other people subsequently agreed with me. "A plan can be "existing" but it takes effect in the future." No. The plan in effect is existing and takes place in the present. "It also can be a recurring plan as others pointed out which means it takes effect more than once, but once it takes effect it is no longer considered a "plan"." When in effect, plans are still plans. "When it takes effect the plan becomes the "existing condition"." Which is functionally synonymous with "existing plan" "Are we clear now?" Yes, but other than yourself, we have never not been clear. "I can't explain it any better." You could, if you were willing to learn something and correct yourself. |
|
|
|