|
|
| Re: Fighting the DOT S(BS) on Woodhaven Blvd (317256) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > BusChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Fighting the DOT S(BS) on Woodhaven Blvd |
|
|
Posted by R30A on Mon Aug 15 19:39:38 2016, in response to Re: Fighting the DOT S(BS) on Woodhaven Blvd, posted by BrooklynBus on Mon Aug 15 19:25:12 2016. "It took several hundred posts until you even read what I wrote" "I didn't say you didn't read my posts. You are still changing what I write in order to prove your erroneous points. " Wow. Direct contradiction. Furthermore, both are clearly lies, as the latter is saying you never said the former, and the former is clearly wrong as you definitively stated something you would have no way of knowing. "What I stated was that I posted an article about the B44 SBS trying to have an intelligent discussion and I got 100 irrelevant posts and arguments, none relating to the topic I wrote about. I received comments like why read the article when we know your history of always being wrong." Except they were entirely relevant. My comments were directly refuting your absurd post which was filled with items irrelevant to the topic at hand and outright falsehoods. "Finally you were the first one to say you read the article. I do not know how much you actually read, but from your responses it was easy to tell you had your conclusions already predetermined." As I responded to all of it, it is pretty clear I read all of it. I don't know if it is worse to be so dishonest as to claim to not have seen that I clearly did read it, or so lazy as to not look and see that I clearly did read it. And yes, when presented with a rant of a report such as yours, of almost no relevance to the topic, it is incredibly unlikely that ones mind would be changed. "Then after about three or four back and forths I told you I was ending the discussion because it was going nowhere and I wasn't going to waste my time with you any more. " LOL. |
|
|
|