Home · Maps · About

Home > BusChat
 

[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[ First in Thread ]

 

view flat

Re: Dictatorship not Democracy

Posted by R30A on Tue Jun 14 20:02:29 2016, in response to Re: Dictatorship not Democracy, posted by BrooklynBus on Tue Jun 14 18:45:18 2016.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailB:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
"No the MAJOR FAIL is with your arithmetic not mine. The portion where statistics are given Metropolitan to Furmanville is not the complete bus lane. It is only half the lane. So the complete lane that was thus far installed would be a six minutes delay, not three. And since that amounts to only half the proposed lane, the delay from Rockaway Blvd to Queens Blvd would be at least 12 minutes, and probably 15 minutes because an extension of the bus lane from Eliot Avenue to Queens Blvd would add at least another two minutes. Your 7.5 minute delay is fictitious because your arithmetic is off."
My arithmetic is immaculate. It is entirely based on the numbers you provided. If you have a problem with any of the numbers, you are disagreeing with numbers you provided. And you are still ignoring the benefits which will come.
p.s. lanes only exist in integer quantities.

"And that doesn't take into account the proposed lanes are not contiguous so the delay would even be greater. For argument sake, let's assume signal improvements wash out the extra delay and you are still left with a 14 minute delay, about twice what you say it is."
Except, unless the numbers you are basing it on are wrong, it would be nowhere near a 14 minute delay,

"You say DOT didn't show the delay for the entire bus lane because of increased turnover."
I certainly DID NOT say that.

"They are not taking down license plate numbers or doing a survey."
That is EXACTLY what they ARE doing.

"They are doing pure counts, so they gave no idea what the turnover is."
That is EXACTLY what they are NOT doing.

"They did not show the delay for the entire bus lane in order to mislead and make the delay appear less tan it really is."
That is your unsubstantiated accusation. Likely false considering the track record of your unsubstantiated accusations.

"But the arithmetic for the portion shown IS A 38 PERCENT DECREASE IN TRAVEL SPEED. You can deny that all you want, BUT THAT'S WHAT THE ARITHMETIC WORKS OUT TO BE WHEN YOU CONSIDER THE DECLINE OF 19.5 MPH TO 12 MPH."
...At one part of the day, in one direction, before the beneficial parts of the project are completed. Sort of like how Ted Cruz won the republican primaries, as he was ahead after Iowa voted. (Hint: He didn't win.)

"You say cars won't have to travel an average speed of 10 to 12 mph for eight mikes, but all indications show that us exactly what will happen."
There is no indication whatsoever that that will happen at all.



(There are no responses to this message.)

Post a New Response

Your Handle:

Your Password:

E-Mail Address:

Subject:

Message:



Before posting.. think twice!


[ Return to the Message Index ]