Home · Maps · About

Home > BusChat
 

[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[ First in Thread | Next in Thread ]

 

view flat

Re: Summary and Video of November 2015 SBS meeting in Woodhaven

Posted by R30A on Tue Mar 15 14:54:25 2016, in response to Re: Summary and Video of November 2015 SBS meeting in Woodhaven, posted by BrooklynBus on Tue Mar 15 14:33:19 2016.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailB:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
"That statement shows your total incompetence."
LOL.

"One lane out if four is being removed from general traffic 24/7."
Yes, in some places at least
In order to determine if that is justified, one must first compute how many rely on those general traffic lanes on a 24/7 basis when the lanes will be ineffect."
No. you use peak hour counts to determine impact on capacity.
"One must also figure out how many daily bus passengers there are to determine how many could possibly benefit."
No, again, as the peak hour riders will disproportionally be the ones who benefit, full day counts are fairly useless.

"SO YOU NEED 24 HOUR COUNTS TO DETERMINE THE FORMER, not only to calculate the peak hour."
Yeah, but the former is an absolutely useless statistic.

"We still do not have 24 hour counts for vehicles other than buses using the road."
Yes. But as they are both useless and functionally unobtainable we never will.
"All we have are limited counts at selected intersections."
Yes.
Those counts tend to indicate that only 20 perecent of vehicle users are riding the bus when 25 percent of the road will be taken away for exclusive bus use.

"Bus riders account for one third of the users during the peak hour"
Yes.
"and far fewer during the period 24 hour period when the proposal would be in effect."
We don't have those counts, but they don't matter anyway.


Responses

Post a New Response

Your Handle:

Your Password:

E-Mail Address:

Subject:

Message:



Before posting.. think twice!


[ Return to the Message Index ]