|
|
| Re: Summary and Video of November 2015 SBS meeting in Woodhaven (310791) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > BusChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Summary and Video of November 2015 SBS meeting in Woodhaven |
|
|
Posted by R30A on Mon Feb 22 22:06:23 2016, in response to Re: Summary and Video of November 2015 SBS meeting in Woodhaven, posted by BrooklynBus on Mon Feb 22 21:50:14 2016. "IF SBS ridership went up for the first year, that means given the same levels of service, it was successful for the first year."Yes, that means the changes are positive. "If there was a big drop in patronage after that, it is no longer successful" Perhaps that means there is an issue with the route. It does not indicate THAT THE ISSUE HAS ANYTHING TO DO WITH CHANGES MADE 2 YEARS PRIOR. " and modifications need to be made to get it back on track," Perhaps, but there is no indication that that has to do with SBS. " maybe add or delete stops, increase enforcement, increase or decrease service etc." Yes, those are universally things which should be constantly looked at with regards to each route. Absolutely NOTHING special about such with regards to SBS "According to your rationale, we need not monitor any routes after the first year once we declare it a success because only the first year matters." Nobody ever said that. What you don't seem to understand is: THOSE HAVE NOTHING WHATSOEVER TO DO WITH THE SBS CONVERSION. "All we need to do is devote all our efforts to establish new routes." Huh? "Ridiculous. If existing routes have problems and they do, those must first be addressed before we create additional routes with problems." So just because some routes have problems we should not improve any routes? Absurdity. |
|
|
|