Home · Maps · About

Home > BusChat
 

[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[ First in Thread ]

 

view flat

Re: Push to Replace Port Authority Bus Terminal

Posted by Joe V on Tue Mar 24 10:05:03 2015, in response to Re: Push to Replace Port Authority Bus Terminal, posted by WillD on Tue Mar 24 02:26:22 2015.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailB:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
There would be a lot of versatility. positive redundancy and choice with all passengers. No project is perfect or is one-size fits all People could freely transfer from train to subway or bus, or from bus to train or subway, whichever they like.

There is no cost estimate of #7 extension to SEC, but if you ask the P-B Project people, they will say in the $8 billion range, depending if there would bea North Hoboken station. That is money better spent than rebuilding a bus terminal, which itself adds no trans-Hudson capacity at all.

What no one is talking about is NJT's imminent conversion of the remaining 40 foot Cruiser fleet to 45 feet. That's about 8 more seats per bus, or 17%. So slightly more ingress and egress time at crunch time. Multiply that by 500 or whatever buses per rush period, and throughput capacity in the terminal will decline on a per bus basis, especially on the pararallel bus lanes.

(There are no responses to this message.)

Post a New Response

Your Handle:

Your Password:

E-Mail Address:

Subject:

Message:



Before posting.. think twice!


[ Return to the Message Index ]