Home · Maps · About

Home > BusChat
 

[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ]
[ First in Thread | Next in Thread ]

 

view flat

Re: NJT's New 62 line with the new 48 line

Posted by BusMgr on Thu Aug 30 14:02:59 2012, in response to Re: NJT's New 62 line with the new 48 line, posted by kknj on Thu Aug 30 13:47:05 2012.

edf40wrjww2msgDetailB:detailStr
fiogf49gjkf0d
That's good for route 62 passengers. But I've never understood a rationale for imposing a extra fee for a standard transfer in the first place. The passenger who does not have the benefit of a single route connecting origin and destination, and who must transfer to complete such travel, does not receive a benefit. Transfers are an inconvenience, and to impose an additional charge on top simply does not make good policy sense.

There is a case for a nominal transfer fee--perhaps 5 or 10 cents, but certainly no more than 25 cents--to discourage the taking of unnecessary transfers for resale to others . . . but even that is unnecessary when transfers are encoded onto retained fare media cards (such as MetroCard) . . . yet Chicago Transit Authority does so.

Responses

Post a New Response

Your Handle:

Your Password:

E-Mail Address:

Subject:

Message:



Before posting.. think twice!


[ Return to the Message Index ]