|
|
| Re: CDTA Update 7/7/2012 (263910) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > BusChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: CDTA Update 7/7/2012 |
|
|
Posted by Scrabbleship on Wed Jul 18 10:43:17 2012, in response to Re: CDTA Update 7/7/2012, posted by Mr. D - Type on Wed Jul 18 09:22:42 2012. The NABI's have always been the red-headed stepchild of CDTA probably due to their smaller size. I think the only argument you can have for keeping the LFS's over them is capacity (an LFS has 8 more seats, a Gillig 9).Then again, put an NABI on any high ridership route and it'll become packed to the gills fast. |
|
|
|