|
|
| Re: Defective Buses (Re: ''Demon Bus'' # 666-Retired???) (263323) | |||
 |
|||
| Home > BusChat | |||
|
[ Read Responses | Post a New Response | Return to the Index ] |
|
||
|
Re: Defective Buses (Re: ''Demon Bus'' # 666-Retired???) |
|
|
Posted by Gotham Bus Co. on Sun Jul 8 10:04:54 2012, in response to Re: Defective Buses (Re: ''Demon Bus'' # 666-Retired???), posted by Brooklyn67 on Sat Jul 7 23:55:12 2012. As I suggested quite clearly and lucidly in post #263312, sabotage can be administrative in nature rather than physical. There is no need to physically damage a bus when it's so much easier to falsely claim that a defect already exists, then refuse to drive the buses until that (non-existent) defect is corrected. This approach still achieves the underlying goal of preventing the buses from entering service, while also giving maintainers overtime pay to find and fix the (non-existent) defect. |
|
|
|